proof: MEN AREN’T HUMAN
February 14, 2010
It’s the day to honor love in all it’s ubiquitous cupidity, and I wanted to give all five of my readers a chuckle. Unfortunately, this is like the third year in a row that I’ve failed to write a certain post delineating in great detail all the myriad ways men suck at love, so this one which I’ve dug out of storage will have to do. Which is no small offering in itself, as the subject matter is only THE HOLY GRAIL FOR FEMINAZIS, and, if there was any doubt proves yet again my utter awesomeness I should have posted this months ago. First, a minor quibble:
For all of recorded history men have been formally inferioritizing females through a variety of government and religious sanctioned institutions. I want to briefly stress that before moving on to the argument which concerns us today. Political systems, religious systems, socio-economic systems have all worked in concert with the express purpose of keeping women in their place as subserviant slutmachines and baby factories. Contrary to popular belief this was not an accident, the words used to institutionalize oppression were planned with deliberation, as were those concepts discussed with the utmost consideration before culminating in action.
Evo-pysch babble, religious dogma, and mainstream proproganda — all spewed by men who to this day claim to comprehend the angelic humanity of females when they aren’t raping us for being whores — and feminists have kindly and painstakingly refuted every one. It also needs emphasing that the vast majority of women’s liberation has been the result of radical feminists backing men into the figurative corner whereby men had no other legitimate option than to 1.) acknowledge some bit of sexism as actual sexism, and 2.) shape the fuck up.
Today a feminazi turns the tables but this time provides irrefutable evidence that males as a class aren’t human. I love making logic do parlour tricks, even more so when those arguments are valid, indefensible, and have drastic consequences. Our argument begins with the definition of humane, which I have no doubt Mr. Webster, if he were alive, would immediately change to something less incriminating.
In order to distinguish those who are fully fledged members of humanity from those who are merely homo sapien, we must remember that humanity is a term bestowed only upon those who express humane qualities — specifically compassion is mentioned most often. And since we can’t say that subjegating those one claims to love is compassionate, we also can’t say that men as a class are humane. And alas, therefore we can’t say that men as a class are fully fledged members of humanity.
Happy valentine’s day!