<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: unpacking the transgenderism baggage:  #1  separate spaces</title>
	<atom:link href="http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/</link>
	<description>No, I&#039;m not going to love a bunch of sexist pigs.  Why do you?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:30:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The fallacy of &#8220;cis privilege&#8221; &#171; fab matters</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-4369</link>
		<dc:creator>The fallacy of &#8220;cis privilege&#8221; &#171; fab matters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 12:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-4369</guid>
		<description>[...] privilege implied by the &#8220;cis/trans&#8221; dichotomy are hetero men. . . Polly Styrene (in a comment over at mAndrea&#8217;s) puts it thusly: Yes the good ol cisgender privilege argument is based on a misunderstanding of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] privilege implied by the &#8220;cis/trans&#8221; dichotomy are hetero men. . . Polly Styrene (in a comment over at mAndrea&#8217;s) puts it thusly: Yes the good ol cisgender privilege argument is based on a misunderstanding of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polly styrene</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>polly styrene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>Yeah most transmen I know Steph didn&#039;t transition until over 30. In fact, for most transmen, the process, or the narrative seems to be very different and much more ambiguous. This is possibly because it&#039;s something that&#039;s not presented in mainstream culture in the same way as being a transwoman is (not that I&#039;m saying mainstream culture&#039;s presentation is accurate there!). And IMHO there ARE less transmen than transwomen around, although we&#039;re always told that&#039;s not the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah most transmen I know Steph didn&#8217;t transition until over 30. In fact, for most transmen, the process, or the narrative seems to be very different and much more ambiguous. This is possibly because it&#8217;s something that&#8217;s not presented in mainstream culture in the same way as being a transwoman is (not that I&#8217;m saying mainstream culture&#8217;s presentation is accurate there!). And IMHO there ARE less transmen than transwomen around, although we&#8217;re always told that&#8217;s not the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polly styrene</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>polly styrene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>My argument Zoe is that of Richard Dawkins and every other good sciencist. There is absolutely no concrete evidence that there is such a thing as brain sex. Now just because something COULD be true, that doesn&#039;t mean it IS true. I&#039;ll believe there&#039;s such a thing as brain sex when you show me proper scientific proof. And not before. 

That requires proof of
a) Correlation and 
b) Causation 

The fact that there is a correlation proves nothing, unless you have causation. It&#039;s like saying people in lower income brackets are more likely to have heart disease. That doesn&#039;t prove that the being poor directly causes the heart disease. It&#039;s a correlation. But there could be a host of other factors causing it. Scientific proof needs to be a lot more rigorous than we can observe two things happening together sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My argument Zoe is that of Richard Dawkins and every other good sciencist. There is absolutely no concrete evidence that there is such a thing as brain sex. Now just because something COULD be true, that doesn&#8217;t mean it IS true. I&#8217;ll believe there&#8217;s such a thing as brain sex when you show me proper scientific proof. And not before. </p>
<p>That requires proof of<br />
a) Correlation and<br />
b) Causation </p>
<p>The fact that there is a correlation proves nothing, unless you have causation. It&#8217;s like saying people in lower income brackets are more likely to have heart disease. That doesn&#8217;t prove that the being poor directly causes the heart disease. It&#8217;s a correlation. But there could be a host of other factors causing it. Scientific proof needs to be a lot more rigorous than we can observe two things happening together sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoe Brain</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-1537</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoe Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-1537</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t comment everywhere, partly because I have a life. And a 7 year old son, And am doing a PhD. After fighting the good fight (did I mention I hate fighting of any kind?) against the Dominionists, the Chauvinists, the just plain bigoted and the marginally sane, discussing the finer points of Radical Feminism sometimes slips off the end of the list.

My apologies Polly, and if you could give me a URL, I&#039;ll add it to my TTD list.

I&#039;m used to blunt dismissal of my views by men. So yours comes as no surprise. It would be nice though for you to give arguments, medical papers, you know, actual evidence showing exactly where I&#039;m wrong.

You&#039;re one of the more intelligent, well-read and rational people amongst the punditocracy. I&#039;ve found many of your posts, especially ones expressing contrary views to my own, very thought-provoking. It&#039;s because you&#039;re worth listening to that I ask those questions. Of course, I have no right to demand that you answer them, there&#039;s been too much demanding and arrogance, too much denial of narratives shown on both sides. So please could you help, and give me your views on the definitions of male and female?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t comment everywhere, partly because I have a life. And a 7 year old son, And am doing a PhD. After fighting the good fight (did I mention I hate fighting of any kind?) against the Dominionists, the Chauvinists, the just plain bigoted and the marginally sane, discussing the finer points of Radical Feminism sometimes slips off the end of the list.</p>
<p>My apologies Polly, and if you could give me a URL, I&#8217;ll add it to my TTD list.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m used to blunt dismissal of my views by men. So yours comes as no surprise. It would be nice though for you to give arguments, medical papers, you know, actual evidence showing exactly where I&#8217;m wrong.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re one of the more intelligent, well-read and rational people amongst the punditocracy. I&#8217;ve found many of your posts, especially ones expressing contrary views to my own, very thought-provoking. It&#8217;s because you&#8217;re worth listening to that I ask those questions. Of course, I have no right to demand that you answer them, there&#8217;s been too much demanding and arrogance, too much denial of narratives shown on both sides. So please could you help, and give me your views on the definitions of male and female?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-1528</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-1528</guid>
		<description>Have you actually got any figures, Sarah, to prove that &quot;statistically&quot;, &quot;transmen transition during their early years&quot;. I&#039;ve yet to find any accurate statistics about anything to do with transitioning - how many transsexuals there are, definitive age-breakdowns, etc...  Is this just another piece of &#039;fact&#039; eminating from the trans-space/activists, or some sort of independent piece of research with a sufficiently large data sample?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you actually got any figures, Sarah, to prove that &#8220;statistically&#8221;, &#8220;transmen transition during their early years&#8221;. I&#8217;ve yet to find any accurate statistics about anything to do with transitioning &#8211; how many transsexuals there are, definitive age-breakdowns, etc&#8230;  Is this just another piece of &#8216;fact&#8217; eminating from the trans-space/activists, or some sort of independent piece of research with a sufficiently large data sample?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-1527</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-1527</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;A complete diffenrent view; I was raised in a very feminist household, so I never had an advantage of beeing raised male. I was always told I would have to to do my share of household in a (potentially) upcumming upbringing family That gave my femin side some extra bit to chew. How can I wish to be a female when there is no difference between the genders. Well I learnded to swallow that bit. But you won’t even have to take a bite.&lt;/i&gt;

Sarah: to raise this point. I was bought up by a 60/70s vocal Feminist mother, and whilst I may have been bought up reasonably gender neutral, the fact is, is that I was still raised male - because that&#039;s what sex I was - and thus, my experiences and upbringing, regardless of gender roles/stereotypes/conformities, are still shaped, unavoidably by whether you are FAB or MAB.. You don&#039;t get an opt-out in most cases!

I&#039;m not quite sure what you&#039;re trying to say re. sharing in household duties - are you saying that because you see this as a &#039;feminine role&#039;? Or that because you shared in them, that gives you some claim/experiences of womanhood?
*confused*

I also don&#039;t think you understand how male privilege works? I&#039;m sorry, but transmen do not start at the same low levels as transwomen. Not all transwomen start from the same low levels either. But, don&#039;t get me into a good old Leftist class warfare rant ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>A complete diffenrent view; I was raised in a very feminist household, so I never had an advantage of beeing raised male. I was always told I would have to to do my share of household in a (potentially) upcumming upbringing family That gave my femin side some extra bit to chew. How can I wish to be a female when there is no difference between the genders. Well I learnded to swallow that bit. But you won’t even have to take a bite.</i></p>
<p>Sarah: to raise this point. I was bought up by a 60/70s vocal Feminist mother, and whilst I may have been bought up reasonably gender neutral, the fact is, is that I was still raised male &#8211; because that&#8217;s what sex I was &#8211; and thus, my experiences and upbringing, regardless of gender roles/stereotypes/conformities, are still shaped, unavoidably by whether you are FAB or MAB.. You don&#8217;t get an opt-out in most cases!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not quite sure what you&#8217;re trying to say re. sharing in household duties &#8211; are you saying that because you see this as a &#8216;feminine role&#8217;? Or that because you shared in them, that gives you some claim/experiences of womanhood?<br />
*confused*</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t think you understand how male privilege works? I&#8217;m sorry, but transmen do not start at the same low levels as transwomen. Not all transwomen start from the same low levels either. But, don&#8217;t get me into a good old Leftist class warfare rant <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polly styrene</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-1526</link>
		<dc:creator>polly styrene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-1526</guid>
		<description>No your gender is NOWHERE Sarah. It doesn&#039;t exist. It is orbiting the earth with the celestial flying teapot. 

Elitism? Elitism? WTF???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

If you call the way women are &lt;strong&gt; TREATED &lt;/strong&gt;  elite Sarah, you&#039;re seriously unsane. 

And you&#039;re mistaking me for someone who cares whether you think I&#039;m bitter or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No your gender is NOWHERE Sarah. It doesn&#8217;t exist. It is orbiting the earth with the celestial flying teapot. </p>
<p>Elitism? Elitism? WTF???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????</p>
<p>If you call the way women are <strong> TREATED </strong>  elite Sarah, you&#8217;re seriously unsane. </p>
<p>And you&#8217;re mistaking me for someone who cares whether you think I&#8217;m bitter or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stormy</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>stormy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 07:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>thebewilderness, the figure is roughly the same in the UK as well (perhaps all of 72% whoopty doo!). Looking at female MPs in the UK, it is about 17%, considering females are about 51% of the population, we should have 51% representation.

Many of us from &#039;old school&#039; feminism have not forgotten about the fundamentals. Something I find annoying with the 3rd wave who seem to stand on the sexual empowerfulness platform (isn&#039;t gunna work btw, fucking your way to respect, master&#039;s house/tools etc). Transactivists also ignore the fundamentals, big time. The transactivist brand of feminism seems to be all about trans, fuck all to do with FABs and the core issues. And a lot of usage of the word &#039;transphobia&#039; when we do not comply with transactivist wishes.

Yes thebewilderness, it is about our liberation. And our autonomy. Autonomy does not include being told what it means to be a FAB by non-FABs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thebewilderness, the figure is roughly the same in the UK as well (perhaps all of 72% whoopty doo!). Looking at female MPs in the UK, it is about 17%, considering females are about 51% of the population, we should have 51% representation.</p>
<p>Many of us from &#8216;old school&#8217; feminism have not forgotten about the fundamentals. Something I find annoying with the 3rd wave who seem to stand on the sexual empowerfulness platform (isn&#8217;t gunna work btw, fucking your way to respect, master&#8217;s house/tools etc). Transactivists also ignore the fundamentals, big time. The transactivist brand of feminism seems to be all about trans, fuck all to do with FABs and the core issues. And a lot of usage of the word &#8216;transphobia&#8217; when we do not comply with transactivist wishes.</p>
<p>Yes thebewilderness, it is about our liberation. And our autonomy. Autonomy does not include being told what it means to be a FAB by non-FABs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thebewilderness</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-1521</link>
		<dc:creator>thebewilderness</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 06:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-1521</guid>
		<description>&quot;Its a bit of the bitterness about radical feminism, I’m about

I thought it was about equal chance, you make it to elitism.&quot;

You know Sarah, a lot of men like to think that feminism is about being equal.
It&#039;s not.
It&#039;s about getting the patriarchy&#039;s boot off our neck.
I&#039;ve been kicking this bloody can down the road for over forty years.
Thousands of women before me have been kicking it for hundreds of years.
No one has a clue what we could do or be if the stinking boot came off our neck.
Right now, in the US, women earn 70% of the dollar that men earn. We haven&#039;t even come close to bloody equal. So don&#039;t even give me any shit about elitism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Its a bit of the bitterness about radical feminism, I’m about</p>
<p>I thought it was about equal chance, you make it to elitism.&#8221;</p>
<p>You know Sarah, a lot of men like to think that feminism is about being equal.<br />
It&#8217;s not.<br />
It&#8217;s about getting the patriarchy&#8217;s boot off our neck.<br />
I&#8217;ve been kicking this bloody can down the road for over forty years.<br />
Thousands of women before me have been kicking it for hundreds of years.<br />
No one has a clue what we could do or be if the stinking boot came off our neck.<br />
Right now, in the US, women earn 70% of the dollar that men earn. We haven&#8217;t even come close to bloody equal. So don&#8217;t even give me any shit about elitism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stormy</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-1520</link>
		<dc:creator>stormy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-1520</guid>
		<description>Sarah, unfortunately I was unable to follow much of your last two comments.

Content-wise, they were all over the place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah, unfortunately I was unable to follow much of your last two comments.</p>
<p>Content-wise, they were all over the place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-1514</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-1514</guid>
		<description>Oh... by the way. Its statistically signiffant, tht most transmen tranistion during their early years... as mroe and more mt2 do. But both have the disatvantage at that time to not earn very much as both are at the start of their career or at collece. Its a completly non argument to say trans men are less blessed than trans women in that way, cause male privilage or not both start at the same low levels. And the trans men then get all that male pivililige that women don&#039;t (anymore?) 

A complete diffenrent view; I was raised in a very feminist household, so I never had an advantage of beeing raised male. I was always told I would have to to do my share of household in a (potentially) upcumming upbringing family That gave my femin side some extra bit to chew.  How can I wish to be a female when there is no difference between the genders. Well I learnded to swallow that bit. But you won&#039;t even have to take a bite.

Its a bit of the bitterness about radical feminism, I&#039;m about

I thought it was about equal chance, you make it to elitism. No one here questioned, why are the female delevelopers better paid? And I don&#039;t know  if you aware of, that when in northern Europe there was esanblished a womens quote in CEO Positions the values of the compaies raised, which had female leaders.

But you cant sum that up to success, wont you? Men and women are equal. there can&#039;t be an advantage of the female kind, too?

I know, that a woman can get every bit of success if there is no hinderness of male privilege. Lot of M2F prooved that. But you only insist theres ever no difference and therefore no such thing as a birth conditioned Gender Identity.

How much du I have to pay you? I provied all the way to manhood for you, and even pay for a good plasty. You will gain all the male priviledge you all like for for yourself
One Exception. If you stop the Hormons, there willbe no money at all
One final Exlusivement- your over 18 and your not TS. And by the way, the hormones have to be importet from Mexico or if youre in Europe from Spain, cause no normal doctor would lead you to hormonal replacement therapie. this isn&#039;t taken light at heart by the medical community.

Oh well. and please nlog about any welcome or unwelcome result.
I think I cant loose my money, if not a F2M tricks me.

And why I am shure of that? You know your gender not whats between your hips, but between your ears.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230; by the way. Its statistically signiffant, tht most transmen tranistion during their early years&#8230; as mroe and more mt2 do. But both have the disatvantage at that time to not earn very much as both are at the start of their career or at collece. Its a completly non argument to say trans men are less blessed than trans women in that way, cause male privilage or not both start at the same low levels. And the trans men then get all that male pivililige that women don&#8217;t (anymore?) </p>
<p>A complete diffenrent view; I was raised in a very feminist household, so I never had an advantage of beeing raised male. I was always told I would have to to do my share of household in a (potentially) upcumming upbringing family That gave my femin side some extra bit to chew.  How can I wish to be a female when there is no difference between the genders. Well I learnded to swallow that bit. But you won&#8217;t even have to take a bite.</p>
<p>Its a bit of the bitterness about radical feminism, I&#8217;m about</p>
<p>I thought it was about equal chance, you make it to elitism. No one here questioned, why are the female delevelopers better paid? And I don&#8217;t know  if you aware of, that when in northern Europe there was esanblished a womens quote in CEO Positions the values of the compaies raised, which had female leaders.</p>
<p>But you cant sum that up to success, wont you? Men and women are equal. there can&#8217;t be an advantage of the female kind, too?</p>
<p>I know, that a woman can get every bit of success if there is no hinderness of male privilege. Lot of M2F prooved that. But you only insist theres ever no difference and therefore no such thing as a birth conditioned Gender Identity.</p>
<p>How much du I have to pay you? I provied all the way to manhood for you, and even pay for a good plasty. You will gain all the male priviledge you all like for for yourself<br />
One Exception. If you stop the Hormons, there willbe no money at all<br />
One final Exlusivement- your over 18 and your not TS. And by the way, the hormones have to be importet from Mexico or if youre in Europe from Spain, cause no normal doctor would lead you to hormonal replacement therapie. this isn&#8217;t taken light at heart by the medical community.</p>
<p>Oh well. and please nlog about any welcome or unwelcome result.<br />
I think I cant loose my money, if not a F2M tricks me.</p>
<p>And why I am shure of that? You know your gender not whats between your hips, but between your ears.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-1506</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-1506</guid>
		<description>We have both the thread of being women and the thread of being abused be your kind. Later may seem harmless but gives the predators even more right to do us harm. If even &quot;our own kind&quot; except us, alt that is left is an it. and this it is something, that can easily destroyed. Sorry. I could even see why you have a fear of leaving preops into woman only spaces (while an errection would easily destinquisch a men form an honest person there) But riddiculing us to  the point where we are an it - only causes to that male violnece happily accepted by the puplic. Aren&#039;t all trannies predators? Espaciallyon poor heterosexual men, whom we told before bit erasing the victim have nothing to fear? Sorry, I been through that. My last and only male lover left after the sex, banned me from his online account and notthinking about MSN he finally told me I&#039;ve deceived, him, made him druk and then user him. The truth ist, and I assured others know, that I told him everything before he still was hot and invited him to my birhtday party where there where other transexuals an discussing the topic there was no chance he could ever escape I&#039;m pre op trans. But that I poor heterosexual was deceivid while I was drunk by a pre op trans. That didn&#039;t lead to violence, I think all that precautions helped. But anyway its the same argument that the morder of Zapata uses. DONT tell me again I don&#039;t know Homophob behavior, and I know many other women and men who received that for being homosexual, who I call friends. And don&#039;t you ever tell me childhood abuse is limited to born(means adivesed sex) and raised in one female gender. 

Don&#039;t ever tell me that theres a glass ceyling, too. Not because there isn&#039;t, I know that one. I know a few things more that might interest you i&#039;ve you?d have an open ear, but that would favor one gender and so you don&#039;t want to here that, the same way no one wondered why female developers are better paid. But both would mean there are differences in the sexes that cannot be ignored.

Which is a further point in distroying a world view, based on so much good intensions and as a may say have brought the western world a good stept further. Especially in the not so sexuall opressed Europe, as I see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have both the thread of being women and the thread of being abused be your kind. Later may seem harmless but gives the predators even more right to do us harm. If even &#8220;our own kind&#8221; except us, alt that is left is an it. and this it is something, that can easily destroyed. Sorry. I could even see why you have a fear of leaving preops into woman only spaces (while an errection would easily destinquisch a men form an honest person there) But riddiculing us to  the point where we are an it &#8211; only causes to that male violnece happily accepted by the puplic. Aren&#8217;t all trannies predators? Espaciallyon poor heterosexual men, whom we told before bit erasing the victim have nothing to fear? Sorry, I been through that. My last and only male lover left after the sex, banned me from his online account and notthinking about MSN he finally told me I&#8217;ve deceived, him, made him druk and then user him. The truth ist, and I assured others know, that I told him everything before he still was hot and invited him to my birhtday party where there where other transexuals an discussing the topic there was no chance he could ever escape I&#8217;m pre op trans. But that I poor heterosexual was deceivid while I was drunk by a pre op trans. That didn&#8217;t lead to violence, I think all that precautions helped. But anyway its the same argument that the morder of Zapata uses. DONT tell me again I don&#8217;t know Homophob behavior, and I know many other women and men who received that for being homosexual, who I call friends. And don&#8217;t you ever tell me childhood abuse is limited to born(means adivesed sex) and raised in one female gender. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t ever tell me that theres a glass ceyling, too. Not because there isn&#8217;t, I know that one. I know a few things more that might interest you i&#8217;ve you?d have an open ear, but that would favor one gender and so you don&#8217;t want to here that, the same way no one wondered why female developers are better paid. But both would mean there are differences in the sexes that cannot be ignored.</p>
<p>Which is a further point in distroying a world view, based on so much good intensions and as a may say have brought the western world a good stept further. Especially in the not so sexuall opressed Europe, as I see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stormy</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-1505</link>
		<dc:creator>stormy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-1505</guid>
		<description>Steph, it seems there is a lot of misplaced attribution to &#039;transphobia&#039; going on, when in reality it is the very unglamorous world of &#039;misogyny&#039;. Sometimes homophobia, depending on circumstance.

It could also be that TWs are unprepared for such treatment, as the FABs have been getting an unhealthy dose of it since the time we were wrapped in pink blankets (hey, you&#039;ve gotta get that sexism in early, girl babies are too stoopid to realise they are inferior and &#039;other&#039;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steph, it seems there is a lot of misplaced attribution to &#8216;transphobia&#8217; going on, when in reality it is the very unglamorous world of &#8216;misogyny&#8217;. Sometimes homophobia, depending on circumstance.</p>
<p>It could also be that TWs are unprepared for such treatment, as the FABs have been getting an unhealthy dose of it since the time we were wrapped in pink blankets (hey, you&#8217;ve gotta get that sexism in early, girl babies are too stoopid to realise they are inferior and &#8216;other&#8217;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-1504</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-1504</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;My point was more that pre-TW (for want of a better term) have idealised vision of what womanhood is about. It comes as a bit of a rude awakening once they get there to find womanhood is being on the receiving end of rape, male violence, sexism, workplace discrimination etc etc (all the stuff feminists have been ‘nagging’ about). They mistakenly attribute this to their ’special case’ of being trans, when in reality - if they pass well enough - they just get a standard woman’s lot. Hence this is why many transactivists are doing their best to win the Oppression Olympics.&lt;/i&gt;

Very true stormy. I have met a large number of M2F transitioners, whom seem to have done so more because of their &#039;rose-tinted&#039; view of what being a woman was about? In some cases, about being &#039;treated as a lady and dressing glam&#039;. In many cases, they were simply unprepared for dealing with how society treats them as both women, and as transwomen.

I&#039;ve also met some transpeople that have been rather resentful that another has been victim to violence, discrimination, etc. on the grounds as being perceived as a woman solely, and not as a transwoman - it that makes sense? (I&#039;ve tried to re-word that a few times).. what I mean is, they are deeply sorry to hear that another transwoman has suffered, but sometimes also have an element of refusal to accept, that it could be because of that person being a woman, rather than as trans? Transactivists always regard an incident as automatically being &#039;transphobic&#039;, but certainly in some cases (if that person has passing privilege), then it actually comes down to mysogyny/woman-hating?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>My point was more that pre-TW (for want of a better term) have idealised vision of what womanhood is about. It comes as a bit of a rude awakening once they get there to find womanhood is being on the receiving end of rape, male violence, sexism, workplace discrimination etc etc (all the stuff feminists have been ‘nagging’ about). They mistakenly attribute this to their ’special case’ of being trans, when in reality &#8211; if they pass well enough &#8211; they just get a standard woman’s lot. Hence this is why many transactivists are doing their best to win the Oppression Olympics.</i></p>
<p>Very true stormy. I have met a large number of M2F transitioners, whom seem to have done so more because of their &#8216;rose-tinted&#8217; view of what being a woman was about? In some cases, about being &#8216;treated as a lady and dressing glam&#8217;. In many cases, they were simply unprepared for dealing with how society treats them as both women, and as transwomen.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also met some transpeople that have been rather resentful that another has been victim to violence, discrimination, etc. on the grounds as being perceived as a woman solely, and not as a transwoman &#8211; it that makes sense? (I&#8217;ve tried to re-word that a few times).. what I mean is, they are deeply sorry to hear that another transwoman has suffered, but sometimes also have an element of refusal to accept, that it could be because of that person being a woman, rather than as trans? Transactivists always regard an incident as automatically being &#8216;transphobic&#8217;, but certainly in some cases (if that person has passing privilege), then it actually comes down to mysogyny/woman-hating?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polly Styrene</title>
		<link>http://feminazi.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/unpacking-the-transgenderism-baggage-1/#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>Polly Styrene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://feminazi.wordpress.com/?p=138#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>I concur with m&#039;learned friend. Maybe we should hold the oppression olympics when the regular ones have finished? Then I get to shout HOMOPHOBIA again.......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with m&#8217;learned friend. Maybe we should hold the oppression olympics when the regular ones have finished? Then I get to shout HOMOPHOBIA again&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
