It’s difficult to find nice art that doesn’t have bodacious bits hanging out. And the women are almost always passively sitting, while the dood is actually doing something. It was really interesting the difference between much of the African-American art and non-AA art. Tons of movement, strong shapes and colors, etc. I’m wanting complex peaceful elegant, and I know I can always get that from Art Nouveau.

Plus I’m sick of POC art being regulated to it’s own special little corner only doing african or repetitive themes when a peaceful mood is intended. POC are frickin everywhere, doing everything, and I’d like images which reflect that normalcy.

Misandrist, much?

“Misandry” is not a word. And as a concept, the word has as much validity as “reverse racism,” (i.e. none whatsoever).

The person posting it went into great detail to slander men, based on, well, nothing at all.

Nothing at all except the fact that men denied education (and the right to own property and vote and to keep their own income, etc.) to women for centuries, keeping women as chattel and leaving them with only their sex-appeal to barter for any financial stability, and at the same time continually ridiculed women for being stupid and “vain.”

Reality has a very anti-male bias. Deal with it, skippy.

Because I quoted the first part, which was stereotyping, generalizing bullshit, and applied snark, because the person who said it, was apparently coming from a point of “Women love wonderfully and purely, and men love you like a pet” or whatever.

If people wouldn’t post generalizations, and stereotypical garbage, I wouldn’t have to point it out.

The first is not an “important bit”, it’s unsubstantiated, biased opinion. Not fact.

The person posting it went into great detail to slander men, based on, well, nothing at all.

“He may indeed actually love the woman, but it’s HIS definition of love that he’s using, and women would behoove themselves to learn this fact.”

To here:
“Because all women are perfect and wonderful and never do wrong, and never do anything selfish, but all men are evil, and never really love women!”

Because the first bit makes an important point about conditioning, expectations, and myths, and the second bit is kinda stoopid.

Why is transgenderism not a fetish? No one ever answers, which is why I keep repeating the question.

You do not have the right to have your comments responded to; that is my right to decide. And the mod box is full of people who think they have a point, but it’s mostly not worth my time delinating why they’re full of shit when their “point” has already been addressed.

Because all women are perfect and wonderful and never do wrong, and never do anything selfish, but all men are evil, and never really love women!

Misandrist, much?

Anyway, it occurred to me that no man in my life–no matter how much love he professed–would ever be doing this for me.

You’d probably assume he was trying to “control” you, and wouldn’t let him help.